Friday, September 30, 2005

Mid-life Crisis

Been thinking about work lately. For the last 5 years I've been at the same job, which is a good job, but somewhat flaky in that it's still pretty much a startup company with no real leadership/direction, no real office space to speak of and no benefits. But on the plus side, I'm making decent(albeit sub-industry standard) scratch, stress is very low, work is often creative and fun, hours are extremely flexible and I have little to no supervision. Plus the office we rent space from is ultra casual and is a very hip and young environment.

But every now and then the rat race mentality kicks in and I feel I should be climbing to the next ladder rung.

So here's my my way of rationalizing it all: Ambition is overrated. Ambition is just a way of saying you need to feel better than others. Unless you have an ambition to do something worthwhile, like be an astronaut or joining Doctors without Borders, then moving forward in your career is just a futile exercise if you're content in your current job. Same s#it, different computer.

But I guess some people are defined my their jobs, and if their career is stalled, their life is. I'd like to think I'm not defined by my job. I see my job as the way to finance the things that do define me: travelling, going out with friends and family, persuing hobbies, and eventually establishing a home and family.

Take Dietrich...a guy I met at a party that worked with troubled youths at the YMCA. Not much room for ambitious career growth there, but I respect him significantly more than any hot shot advertising exec or partner at a bay street law firm...

1 Comments:

At 8:59 AM, Blogger ct said...

i've been saying this forever. all people are irrational. i have two points to make.

first, i think ambition is a result of unhappiness. cause if you're easily satisfied, you wont have much drive. look at self-made billionaires. before they became billionaires, they were multi-millionaires. at that point, most people would just retire and enjoy life. so it follows that billionaires were unsatisfied even then. i think it's not only talent that makes billionaires. you also have to be pretty unhappy in the first place. this applies to the other cases you mentioned. unsatisfied managers want to be execs, unsatisfied professionals at average firms want to be partners at prestigious firms. and so on. my point is, ambition and dissatisfaction are one and the same.

second, at the most basic level, people only need a few simple things to be happy. if you had enough to eat, good housing, a stable job, love of family and friends, that should really be enough. and these things can be abundant. i mean, you can have enough of these for everybody. so in theory, there could be a utopian society where everybody has everything they need to be happy. but in truth, people want things that by definition cannot be abundant, like fame, status, prestige, power, etc. so until we can all drop these unnecessary desires, there can't be a utopia. in essence, one aspect of individual happiness is to be better off than others around them. which is a glaring contradiction to society's stated goal for everybody to happy.

"The trouble with the rat race is that even if you win, you're still a rat." — Lily Tomlin

 

Post a Comment

<< Home